請(qǐng)問(wèn)愛因斯坦之后最偉大的物理學(xué)家是誰(shuí)？

我還是支持機(jī)器貓的人選，但需要包攬E一分形時(shí)空，看. Anthony Judge最近寄過(guò)來(lái)的文章，對(duì)維度在量子現(xiàn)實(shí)與用二維表達(dá)三維螺旋，這涉及到一個(gè)普通的物理現(xiàn)象 邊界=n一1問(wèn)題是，通過(guò)將意義的二維圖案渲染到3D中，尤其是通過(guò)識(shí)別與任何這樣的拓?fù)渥儞Q相關(guān)聯(lián)的動(dòng)態(tài)，是否可以實(shí)現(xiàn)更豐富的洞察。在二維圖案可以以某種方式被認(rèn)知地體現(xiàn)為身份的焦點(diǎn)的程度上，圖案的“擠出”在3D中的形式尤其令人感興趣。那么，就有這樣的暗示，即2D模式是一種特別限制的對(duì)身份的更豐富和更深刻的感覺的投射--這是對(duì)時(shí)代不恰當(dāng)?shù)南拗疲苍S是危險(xiǎn)的。在三維。這可能與激發(fā)富有想象力的新思維有關(guān)-超越了許多二元的framings，而目前的棘手沖突是持續(xù)存在的。這樣的三維效果圖能“攜帶”、產(chǎn)生和區(qū)分什么更微妙的見解-特別是作為一種手段，以抵制它們?cè)趯?shí)踐中不正常地合并的傾向？

從2d到3d的視角轉(zhuǎn)換，本身就有助于對(duì)“量子現(xiàn)實(shí)”的個(gè)體和集體含義的考慮。他們的可信度得到了亞歷山大·Wendt(量子)(量子精神與社會(huì)科學(xué)：統(tǒng)一物理與社會(huì)本體論，2015)的論證。這種可能性更有意義，因?yàn)檫@一論點(diǎn)是從國(guó)際關(guān)系中最具爭(zhēng)議性的學(xué)者之一的角度提出的，特別關(guān)注國(guó)際安全問(wèn)題。他特別提出了對(duì)傳統(tǒng)的對(duì)全球系統(tǒng)劃分為“狀態(tài)”的理解的質(zhì)疑，這表明需要一個(gè)量子模。

The question is whether and how richer insight might be enabled by rendering two-dimensional patterns of significance into 3D, notably through recognition of the dynamics associated with any such topological transformation. To the extent that a two-dimensional pattern may be cognitively embodied in some way as a focus of identity, the "extrusion" of the pattern to engender a form in 3D is particularly intriguing. There is then the implication that the 2D pattern is an especially restricted projection of a richer and deeper sense of identity -- a limitation inappropriate to the times, and perhaps dangerously so.

There is the possibility that forms of connectivity that prove difficult in 2D, if not impossible, may be rendered comprehensible by renderings in 3D. This could be relevant to eliciting imaginative new thinking -- transcending the many binary framings by which intractable conflicts are currently sustained. What subtler insights can such 3D renderings "carry", engender and distinguish -- notably as a means of counteracting tendencies to their dysfunctional conflation in practice?

The transformation of perspective from 2D to 3D can itself help to frame consideration of the individual and collective implications of "quantum reality". Their credibility has been remarkably argued by Alexander Wendt (Quantum Mind and Social Science: unifying physical and social ontology, 2015). The possibility is all the more relevant because that argument is made from the perspective of one of the most prominenent scholars of international relations with a special focus on international security. He notably calls into question the conventional understanding of the division of the global system into "states", suggesting the need for a quantum model of human identity-